Difference between revisions of "Journa.host"

From Mew
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "category:instance category:mastodon * '''site''': https://journa.host journa.host [https://journa.host/@info/109372514074976879 suspended] two users, stating that...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[category:instance]]
 
[[category:instance]]
 
[[category:mastodon]]
 
[[category:mastodon]]
 +
[[category:problematic]]
 
* '''site''': https://journa.host
 
* '''site''': https://journa.host
  
−
[[journa.host]] [https://journa.host/@info/109372514074976879 suspended] two users, stating that {{fmt/quote|One published several posts attacking the integrity of another, who is a moderator on the server.
+
[[journa.host]] (JH) [https://journa.host/@info/109372514074976879 suspended] two users, stating that {{fmt/quote|One published several posts attacking the integrity of another, who is a moderator on the server.
−
The second user published a post demeaning the professionalism of a journalist, based on their identity.}} What they did not note is that the first one had published transmisic content, and the second one had called that into question.
+
The second user published a post demeaning the professionalism of a journalist, based on their identity.}} The critic was Parker Molloy, and the criticized admin is one Mike Pesca. What JH did not note is that the first one had published transmisic content, and the second one had called that into question.
−
 
+
==2022-11-21==
 +
* [https://retro.social/@ajroach42/109377815959702190 retro.social has silenced them].
 +
==2022-11-20==
 +
* [https://masto.ai/@parkermolloy/109377879615134816 Parker Molloy] defends JH, urges not blocking them
 +
** Other users have noted that something should still be done about Mike Pesca, though.
 +
==2022-11-19==
 
This seems like a classic example of journalistic "both sides"ing.
 
This seems like a classic example of journalistic "both sides"ing.
−
 
−
Apparently the critic was Parker Molloy, and the criticized admin is one Mike Pesca.
 
  
 
Much criticism ensued (saving links in case the original post is deleted, making them hard to find):
 
Much criticism ensued (saving links in case the original post is deleted, making them hard to find):

Latest revision as of 13:22, 21 November 2022

journa.host (JH) suspended two users, stating that «One published several posts attacking the integrity of another, who is a moderator on the server. The second user published a post demeaning the professionalism of a journalist, based on their identity.» The critic was Parker Molloy, and the criticized admin is one Mike Pesca. What JH did not note is that the first one had published transmisic content, and the second one had called that into question.

2022-11-21

2022-11-20

  • Parker Molloy defends JH, urges not blocking them
    • Other users have noted that something should still be done about Mike Pesca, though.

2022-11-19

This seems like a classic example of journalistic "both sides"ing.

Much criticism ensued (saving links in case the original post is deleted, making them hard to find):

Retrieved from "https://mew.toot.cat/mw/index.php?title=Journa.host&oldid=631"