Difference between revisions of "Bylines.social"
		
		
		
		
		
		Jump to navigation
		Jump to search
		
				
		
		
	
m  | 
				|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[category:instance]]  | [[category:instance]]  | ||
[[category:Mastodon]]  | [[category:Mastodon]]  | ||
| + | [[category:blocked]]  | ||
| + | [[category:transmisia]]  | ||
* '''site''': https://bylines.social/  | * '''site''': https://bylines.social/  | ||
** '''main/admin''': [https://bylines.social/@clarion @clarion]  | ** '''main/admin''': [https://bylines.social/@clarion @clarion]  | ||
Latest revision as of 19:25, 17 January 2023
- site: https://bylines.social/
- main/admin: @clarion
 
 
About
bylines.social is a Mastodon instance created by/for the Bylines Network, with Yorkshire Bylines as the primary poster currently. While they appear to be firmly reality-based, they also appear to have had rather poor judgement regarding moderation.
History
- 2023-01-17 blocked for transmisia -- I guess they were still being too light in moderating the fash. —W.
 - 2023-01-03 Effective shunning (via) «One of the bonuses of being on Mastodon is the fediverse is actually strong about crushing bad actors. A shiny new newspaper out of Yorkshire trying to make it in an online world published a lazy, stupid opinion piece about trans people — it’s England, you know, the place is infested with transphobes — and got slammed hard for it.»
- Note: I have not been able to find the opinion piece described. —W.
 
 - 2023-01-02 bylines.social/@YorksBylines «If we can establish a consensus that trans men are men and trans women are women, it is likely to add to the safety of all as it increases the open-mindedness of society and challenges fears and divisions »
- linked: 2023-01-02 Transgender rights: everything old is new again «Whenever any section of society starts to stand up for its rights it faces a barrage of criticism and people come up with some very overblown theories about what will go wrong if we start treating them more reasonably.»
 - A user reported this post, concerned that it represented an invitation to (re)open "debate" on whether trans people are who they say they are:
- It's entirely understandable to be concerned about any framing of trans rights as a "debate", but I think this post is more about seeking to establish a solid consensus against the the idea that such debate is legitimate -- where the purpose of "consensus" in this context is that nobody can get away with pretending there's any serious debate on the matter. Looking at a smattering of other posts on the instance and on the Yorkshire Bylines site, they seem solidly reality-based. —W.