Bylines.social - Revision history

Woozle at 19:25, 17 January 2023

2023-01-17T19:25:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:25, 17 January 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[category:instance]]		[[category:instance]]
	[[category:Mastodon]]		[[category:Mastodon]]
			[[category:blocked]]
			[[category:transmisia]]
	* '''site''': https://bylines.social/		* '''site''': https://bylines.social/
	** '''main/admin''': [https://bylines.social/@clarion @clarion]		** '''main/admin''': [https://bylines.social/@clarion @clarion]

Woozle at 19:25, 17 January 2023

2023-01-17T19:25:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:25, 17 January 2023
Line 5:		Line 5:
	==About==		==About==
	[[bylines.social]] is a Mastodon instance created by/for the [https://bylinesnetwork.co.uk/ Bylines Network], with Yorkshire Bylines as the primary poster currently. While they appear to be firmly reality-based, they also appear to have had rather poor judgement regarding moderation.		[[bylines.social]] is a Mastodon instance created by/for the [https://bylinesnetwork.co.uk/ Bylines Network], with Yorkshire Bylines as the primary poster currently. While they appear to be firmly reality-based, they also appear to have had rather poor judgement regarding moderation.
	==~~Report~~==		==History==
	~~A user reported~~ [https://~~bylines~~.social/@~~YorksBylines~~/~~109619544194168335 this post~~]~~, concerned that~~ it ~~represented~~ an ~~invitation to (re)open "debate" on whether~~ trans people ~~are who they say they are~~:		* '''2023-01-17''' [https://toot.cat/@news/109706098784877596 blocked for transmisia] -- I guess they were still being too light in moderating the fash. {{w/init}}
			* '''2023-01-03''' [https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2023/01/03/effective-shunning/ Effective shunning] ([https://octodon.social/@pzmyers/109625736155255416 via]) {{fmt/quote\|One of the bonuses of being on Mastodon is the fediverse is actually strong about crushing bad actors. A shiny new newspaper out of Yorkshire trying to make it in an online world published a lazy, stupid opinion piece about trans people — it’s England, you know, the place is infested with transphobes — and got [https://masto.ai/@stavvers/109625132804829976 slammed hard for it].}}
			** Note: I have not been able to find the opinion piece described. {{w/init}}
	* '''2023-01-02''' [https://bylines.social/@YorksBylines/109619544194168335 bylines.social/@YorksBylines] {{fmt/quote\|If we can establish a consensus that trans men are men and trans women are women, it is likely to add to the safety of all as it increases the open-mindedness of society and challenges fears and divisions \| Andy Brown / #Bylines #Transgender #TransRightsAreHumanRights}}		* '''2023-01-02''' [https://bylines.social/@YorksBylines/109619544194168335 bylines.social/@YorksBylines] {{fmt/quote\|If we can establish a consensus that trans men are men and trans women are women, it is likely to add to the safety of all as it increases the open-mindedness of society and challenges fears and divisions \| Andy Brown / #Bylines #Transgender #TransRightsAreHumanRights}}
	** linked: '''2023-01-02''' [https://yorkshirebylines.co.uk/politics/transgender-rights-everything-old-is-new-again/ Transgender rights: everything old is new again] {{fmt/quote\|Whenever any section of society starts to stand up for its rights it faces a barrage of criticism and people come up with some very overblown theories about what will go wrong if we start treating them more reasonably.}}		** linked: '''2023-01-02''' [https://yorkshirebylines.co.uk/politics/transgender-rights-everything-old-is-new-again/ Transgender rights: everything old is new again] {{fmt/quote\|Whenever any section of society starts to stand up for its rights it faces a barrage of criticism and people come up with some very overblown theories about what will go wrong if we start treating them more reasonably.}}
			** A user reported [https://bylines.social/@YorksBylines/109619544194168335 this post], concerned that it represented an invitation to (re)open "debate" on whether trans people are who they say they are:
	It's entirely understandable to be concerned about any framing of trans rights as a "debate", but I think this post is more about seeking to establish a solid consensus ''against'' the the idea that such debate is legitimate -- where the purpose of "consensus" in this context is that nobody can get away with pretending there's any serious debate on the matter.		*** It's entirely understandable to be concerned about any framing of trans rights as a "debate", but I think this post is more about seeking to establish a solid consensus ''against'' the the idea that such debate is legitimate -- where the purpose of "consensus" in this context is that nobody can get away with pretending there's any serious debate on the matter. Looking at a smattering of other posts on the instance and on the Yorkshire Bylines site, they seem solidly reality-based. {{w/init}}

	Looking at a smattering of other posts on the instance and on the Yorkshire Bylines site, they seem solidly reality-based.
	~~==Commentary==~~
	* '''2023-01-03''' [https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2023/01/03/effective-shunning/ Effective shunning] ([https://octodon.social/@pzmyers/109625736155255416 via]) {{fmt/quote\|One of the bonuses of being on Mastodon is the fediverse is actually strong about crushing bad actors. A shiny new newspaper out of Yorkshire trying to make it in an online world published a lazy, stupid opinion piece about trans people — it’s England, you know, the place is infested with transphobes — and got [https://masto.ai/~~@stavvers/109625132804829976 slammed hard for it].~~}}
	** Note: I have not been able to find the opinion piece described. -W.

Woozle at 20:55, 4 January 2023

2023-01-04T20:55:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:55, 4 January 2023
Line 4:		Line 4:
	** '''main/admin''': [https://bylines.social/@clarion @clarion]		** '''main/admin''': [https://bylines.social/@clarion @clarion]
	==About==		==About==
	[[bylines.social]] is a Mastodon instance created by/for the [https://bylinesnetwork.co.uk/ Bylines Network], with Yorkshire Bylines as the primary poster currently.		[[bylines.social]] is a Mastodon instance created by/for the [https://bylinesnetwork.co.uk/ Bylines Network], with Yorkshire Bylines as the primary poster currently. While they appear to be firmly reality-based, they also appear to have had rather poor judgement regarding moderation.
	==Report==		==Report==
	A user reported [https://bylines.social/@YorksBylines/109619544194168335 this post], concerned that it represented an invitation to (re)open "debate" on whether trans people are who they say they are:		A user reported [https://bylines.social/@YorksBylines/109619544194168335 this post], concerned that it represented an invitation to (re)open "debate" on whether trans people are who they say they are:
Line 13:		Line 13:

	Looking at a smattering of other posts on the instance and on the Yorkshire Bylines site, they seem solidly reality-based.		Looking at a smattering of other posts on the instance and on the Yorkshire Bylines site, they seem solidly reality-based.
			==Commentary==
			* '''2023-01-03''' [https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2023/01/03/effective-shunning/ Effective shunning] ([https://octodon.social/@pzmyers/109625736155255416 via]) {{fmt/quote\|One of the bonuses of being on Mastodon is the fediverse is actually strong about crushing bad actors. A shiny new newspaper out of Yorkshire trying to make it in an online world published a lazy, stupid opinion piece about trans people — it’s England, you know, the place is infested with transphobes — and got [https://masto.ai/@stavvers/109625132804829976 slammed hard for it].}}
			** Note: I have not been able to find the opinion piece described. -W.

Woozle: Created page with "category:instance category:Mastodon * '''site''': https://bylines.social/ ** '''main/admin''': [https://bylines.social/@clarion @clarion] ==About== bylines.social..."

2023-01-03T15:45:14Z

Created page with "category:instance category:Mastodon * '''site''': https://bylines.social/ ** '''main/admin''': [https://bylines.social/@clarion @clarion] ==About== bylines.social..."

New page

[[category:instance]]
[[category:Mastodon]]
* '''site''': https://bylines.social/
** '''main/admin''': [https://bylines.social/@clarion @clarion]
==About==
[[bylines.social]] is a Mastodon instance created by/for the [https://bylinesnetwork.co.uk/ Bylines Network], with Yorkshire Bylines as the primary poster currently.
==Report==
A user reported [https://bylines.social/@YorksBylines/109619544194168335 this post], concerned that it represented an invitation to (re)open "debate" on whether trans people are who they say they are:
* '''2023-01-02''' [https://bylines.social/@YorksBylines/109619544194168335 bylines.social/@YorksBylines] {{fmt/quote|If we can establish a consensus that trans men are men and trans women are women, it is likely to add to the safety of all as it increases the open-mindedness of society and challenges fears and divisions | Andy Brown / #Bylines #Transgender #TransRightsAreHumanRights}}
** linked: '''2023-01-02''' [https://yorkshirebylines.co.uk/politics/transgender-rights-everything-old-is-new-again/ Transgender rights: everything old is new again] {{fmt/quote|Whenever any section of society starts to stand up for its rights it faces a barrage of criticism and people come up with some very overblown theories about what will go wrong if we start treating them more reasonably.}}

It's entirely understandable to be concerned about any framing of trans rights as a "debate", but I think this post is more about seeking to establish a solid consensus ''against'' the the idea that such debate is legitimate -- where the purpose of "consensus" in this context is that nobody can get away with pretending there's any serious debate on the matter.

Looking at a smattering of other posts on the instance and on the Yorkshire Bylines site, they seem solidly reality-based.